How Do Black Authors Perusade Others With Stories? (feat. Harriet Jacobs and Booker T. Washington)

During the United States’ long road from slavery toward civil rights, many Black authors have produced works that spread personal experience, revealing parts of the United States that tried to hide. In this blog, I would like to focus on two specific works, Incidents in the Life of a Slave Girl by Harriet Jacobs (1861), and Up from Slavery by Booker T. Washington (1901). These two autobiographies highlight important topics regarding slavery and the injustice that occurred during their lives. However, one important difference comes from the purpose in writing these autobiographies and the intended audience of each. On one hand, Jacobs writes to persuade and educate Northerners by showcasing slavery’s sexual and domestic brutality. On the other hand, Washington writes in an attempt to uplift others, showing how hard work and education can lead to advancement for Black Americans.

Harriet Jacobs makes her purpose very clear from the start and remains present throughout the entire autobiography. In fact, one of the main reasons she wrote a preface to the book was to bring up the fact that she wished to “arouse the women of the North” against slavery. To accomplish that, she writes her autobiography to share her traumatic experience as a slave in hopes of spreading the truth about slavery to the people in the North. The information that she chooses to include and the wording of the information changes as a result of this goal. Jacobs realizes that most people in the North most likely do not want to read an autobiography that focuses only on gruesome depictions of how they were treated, because doing so might break the norm for what was “socially okay to do” in the North. Though she still describes the unjust treatment and horrible punishments, she also goes to great lengths to make things more understandable and relatable for Northern readers, including metaphors relating to religion and focusing on the impact on herself. This way, she can both spread her experience and also make people in the North more likely to sympathize and share with others.

Booker T. Washington’s autobiography follows a slightly different structure, and his purpose is not explicitly stated. Though he does so in the beginning, Washington does not spend quite as much time delving into his negative experiences in slavery as Jacobs did. Rather, he includes discussions on the parts of slavery that had a positive impact on slaves. For example, he discusses how slaves gained skills and experience from working for their masters. He also talks about how some slaves had close connections with their masters, which made them more inclined to care for them during the Civil War and created conflicting feelings at the end when they were freed. In addition to this, Washington shares his journey towards better education, detailing his hard-work and the effort he put in to get to where he was. Ultimately, Washington’s point becomes clear in his “cast down your buckets where you are” statement. Black Americans should be putting their head down to work hard and self-improve using what they have around them, rather than pursuing more. Washington writes in an attempt to both inspire other Black Americans and persuade potential white supporters.

Both of these autobiographies are a specially crafted creation that works not only to unveil the truth about the treatment of slaves, but also towards another, greater goal. In the case of Harriet Jacobs, she writes in order for people in the North to become more educated on the experiences and horrors of women in slavery. In the case of Booker T. Washington, he writes to inspire other Black Americans to work hard and highlight the usefulness of Black Americans for others. These differences stem in part from the time period in which each was written. Jacobs, having written and published her autobiography in the 1860s, wishes more people would come to fight against slavery. Washington writes around the 1900s though, when slavery had been abolished but Black Americans were still facing racism, so his focus is on building a path forward within an unequal society. Together, the two texts show how Black autobiography can be both personal and political, changing its tone and goals depending on what is still being fought for. 

Comments

  1. Hey Ian,
    I agree with what you are saying here, as I wrote about something very similar. These two different ways these authors approached the topic of slavery are very revealing of their motives and character. Harriet wanted to show the horrors of slavery to a largely white audience, and BTW wished to gain the appreciation and show the "benefits" of slavery. It's hard to know who to agree with, but you do a great job of explaining both points.
    -Connor

    ReplyDelete
  2. Hi Ian,
    I do find the different ways that authors go about the telling of slavery/their stories interesting. Within the stories we've read and in which you have mentioned, the hard parts of slavery are mentioned, though other parts considered "good" are mentioned as well. Either way, both stories cover the same idea; they're just represented and spoken differently. Nice job!

    ReplyDelete
  3. Hi Ian,
    I really liked this blog! I like how mention in the end that these two different stories served different purposes in the efforts of overcoming the history of slavery. I feel like while reading BTW's autobiographies I felt that he was undermining the severity of slavery and believed that BTW's perspective should also be undermined too, but after reading your blog, I see that BTW's story had it's own specific impact. This blog kind of opened my eyes to a new perspective! Great Job!

    ReplyDelete
  4. Ian, I agree with your last remark on how Black autobiography can be both personal and political. Personally, I think that Washington and Jacobs' are on opposite sides of this spectrum. Like you said, Washington is more "forgiving of slavery," and Jacob's is more trying to bring light to the injustices of slavery that not only she went through but most of the black population at the time.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Hey Ian!
    I like how you clearly explain the different purposes behind Incidents in the Life of a Slave Girl and Up from Slavery. Your point about audience shaping each autobiography was really thoughtful, especially how you mention that Jacobs writes to persuade Northern readers by focusing on the realities of sexual and domestic abuse. On the other hand, Washington emphasizes education and hard work to inspire Black Americans. I also liked how you connected these differences to the time periods in which they were written and what was still being fought for. Nice post!

    ReplyDelete
  6. Hi Ian,
    This is an interesting connection between the two stories that I hadn't really thought about. Both of the two accounts of slavery somewhat alter their content to reach their desired audience, and send their desired message. The two works kind of omit some of the same types of details, but for completely different reasons. Jacobs tones down parts of her story to be able to hold a white audience, and educate them on the atrocities of slavery. Washington tones down aspects of his own experience to encourage other black people to move on into "free" society. I really enjoyed reading this post!

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Autobiographies of BTW and Malcolm X

Civil Rights By the Riverside